On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:07:26PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:35:16PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Build tools are most of the time so small or trivial (gcc is > > probably the exception, before that perl probably was) that > > building them again is lost in creating the rescue bits itself. > > Please no, don't pessimize the build even more than it absolutely has to > be. > release/Makefile had a similar issue when I've been working on a cross support for it (both cross-release and cross-platform). The release.5 still has to run the build-tools target again as it has no idea what tools contribute to the build-tools list. Another pessimization is with release.3, where we do a second buildworld pass with SUBDIR_OVERRIDE, but this pessimization is for a good reason. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru_at_sunbay.com Sunbay Software Ltd, ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:13 UTC