On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Ian Freislich wrote: > Ian Freislich wrote: > > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > Squashed the bug that was causing panics with nice processes on SMP ULE. > > > > That is really good news. I will give it a try later today and let > > you know if I still get panics with ULE enabled. > > Well, the uptime says it all: no panics yet which is very nice. Thank-you. > > It seems that there is still a problem with the CPU accounting > (which is certainly not a problem far less severe than panics) > Yep, I'll get to that next. > last pid: 906; load averages: 2.61, 2.50, 2.41 up 0+01:21:16 14:29:36 > 38 processes: 4 running, 34 sleeping > CPU states: 0.0% user, 99.8% nice, 0.0% system, 0.2% interrupt, 0.0% idle > Mem: 21M Active, 15M Inact, 22M Wired, 4K Cache, 28M Buf, 127M Free > Swap: 512M Total, 512M Free > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND > 580 ianf 139 20 1072K 880K RUN 0 78:46 105.47% 105.47% dnetc > 574 ianf 139 20 1072K 880K CPU1 1 79:21 100.78% 100.78% dnetc > 451 root 114 0 3468K 2564K select 1 0:02 13.28% 13.28% sshd > 372 root 4 0 1296K 976K accept 1 0:00 6.25% 6.25% nfsd > 906 root 76 0 2220K 1476K CPU0 0 0:00 2.34% 2.34% top > 899 ianf 8 0 1632K 1340K wait 0 0:00 0.78% 0.78% su > > Ian >Received on Tue Jul 08 2003 - 07:24:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:14 UTC