On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Kenneth Culver wrote: > > AH so it's direct DSL with either a fixed IP or DHCP or similar? > > Yep, basically I don't have a DSL modem, I have an Ethernet to ATM bridge > (using AAL5 encapsulation I believe) running over the DSL. I have 2 fixed > IP's, and in my normal configuration, my two BSD boxes are hooked up to a > switch that also hooks to the DSL modem. One of my BSD boxes also runs > ipfilter/ipnat/dnscache/dhcpd/postfix for my local mail and to allow the > other 4 people living in the house, as well as my mac (macos X 10.2.6), my > pc laptop, and my dreamcast to access the internet. That should be enough > info :-) > > > in that case, then what does it look like speed-wise if you transfer > > from the internet to the MAC using the BSD machine as a router? > > > Transferring anything through the BSD NAT box shows the same performance > issues, as well as transferring directly from BSD to the DSL modem on both > of my BSD machines. Using windows or the mac directly connected to the DSL > modem shows the normal bandwidth capability. I know the hardware isn't the > problem, both of the BSD boxes are totally different. If you think it > matters I can send the specs too. > > > Ken Can you do a 'netstat -s -p tcp >> tcpstats' before and after the transfer? This should tell us if there were retransmits etc. It could be a difference in minimum rtt values or a congestion issue that results in timeout for our stack but some other recovery mechanism with other stacks. Thanks, JeffReceived on Wed Jul 09 2003 - 11:33:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:14 UTC