In the last episode (Jul 09), Kenneth Culver said: > > In the last episode (Jul 09), Kenneth Culver said: > > > > look of any large values in the timestamps and see if there is > > > > anything before that indicates a lost packet or a re-ordered one or > > > > something (or a retransmitted ack) > > > > > > > > The key is to find the gap in the arriving packets and figure out > > > > what caused it.. > > > > > > > Alright, I'll have to do this later this evening, don't have time > > > right now. Thanks for the help though. > > > > Tcptrace is great for this; the tsg output graph will mark out-of-order > > packets and duplicate acks for you. > > > Alright, I used this and got a bunch of xpl graphs, but I'm not really > sure what I'm looking at or for. The only graph I really understand is the > d2c_tput.xpl, which is the thruput of the ftp data connection from > ftp2.freebsd.org to my machine. I have posted the xpl's, along with the > binary tcpdump output used to create the graphs. I've also posted the > ascii output of the same download. All of these are posted at > http://www.glue.umd.edu/~culverk/ > > the graphs are *.xpl, the binary output is tcpdump.out, and the ascii is > tcpdump.ascii. I don't see anything majorly wrong here.. > 2: kenshin:49179 - ftp2.freebsd.org:58751 (c2d) 717> 1022< (complete) This is the data transfer, so the d2c_* plots are the interesting ones (they graph the traffic from ftp2 to you). If you load up d2c_tput.xpl, you can see that your throughput averaged ~164K/s for almost the entire time. The red line is the short-term average, and you can see there were four dips, corresponding to packet loss. Flip over to the d2c_tsg.xpl plot, which graphs the sent packets, ACKs, and the receive window. At 21:52:32.8, it looks like four consecutive packets were dropped. Luckily, the packets were resent quickly, and transmission resumed at full speed. Dips 3 and 4 look the same. Dip 2 has an extra .2 second delay for some reason. It looks like fast restransmit kicked in on all three dips, but for some reason it didn't recover fast enough on #2. A TCP guru will have to tell you what to do next... -- Dan Nelson dnelson_at_allantgroup.comReceived on Wed Jul 09 2003 - 21:24:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:14 UTC