In message <3F0DCB21.1060704_at_tcoip.com.br>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: >> +-------[ Poul-Henning Kamp ]---------------------- >> | >> | I think we need somebody to reconsider how we configure our filesystems >> | in the future, in order to avoid a confusion of config files whose >> | interrelationship users will have no chance of figuring out. >> | >> | We have CCD, GBDE, MD and in the future likely other technologies for >> | configuring the underlying devices, we have FSCK, UFS and NFS and >> | other filesystems to mount. >> | >> | Somebody must be able to come up with some creative stuff here... ? >> >> We want .... >> >> A REGISTRY! >> >> Ni! Ni! Ni! Ni! Ni! Ni! > >Bah. Add a prerequisites field to fstab with all the filesystems that >must be mounted before that one can be mounted. That's not enough. I have filesystems I don't want fscked/mounted until after sshd will accept my login for instance (I hate waiting for a fsck of /home/ncvs...) (Yes yes yes, bgfsck improves things a bit). Please don't hack /etc/fstab yet another time, please try to do it in a future-proof way (which doesn't suck) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Thu Jul 10 2003 - 11:31:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:14 UTC