On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:48:38PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <340CBBD2-B568-11D7-BE3B-0003937E39E0_at_mac.com> > David Leimbach <leimy2k_at_mac.com> writes: > : So for the one way conversion of signed to unsigned it will behave like > : 2's compliment > : all the time. What about back to signed? > > Same way. > > It will be reduced by the maximum value of the range plus one to do > the conversion. No, this case is implementation-defined if the value cannot be represented by the signed type it is converted to. (If it can be represented then the value will be preserved.) > > See section for 6.3.1.3 for the details. Yes, please do. > > That's why I said 'as if' in my other mail. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013_at_student.uu.seReceived on Sun Jul 13 2003 - 10:56:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:15 UTC