Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

From: Harti Brandt <brandt_at_fokus.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 21:40:22 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Thomas Moestl wrote:

TM>On Tue, 2003/07/15 at 12:04:56 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
TM>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:00:17PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
TM>> > Marcel Moolenaar <marcel_at_xcllnt.net> writes:
TM>> > > It needs to be analyzed because cross-builds should not fail. Do
TM>> > > we have a machine problem? What exactly is dumping core? Is it
TM>> > > gzip or some binary started immediately after it? If it's gzip,
TM>> > > is there a relation with the recent compiler warning about strncmp?
TM>> >
TM>> > It's not a machine problem if it only happens to the sparc64 build -
TM>> > the same machine runs all the other -CURRENT tinderboxen except
TM>> > powerpc.
TM>>
TM>> It does not only happen to sparc64. I've seen it fail for all but
TM>> i386 and pc98, I think.
TM>
TM>i386 and pc98 have failed too (random example: July 5).

But sparc64 fails quite regularily when gziping man pages. The others are
more random.

Since about the same time I have dumping core make during make universe on
my i386. The core shows differnt signals (4, 10, even SIGILL), but always
in vfork().

harti
-- 
harti brandt,
http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
brandt_at_fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti_at_freebsd.org
Received on Tue Jul 15 2003 - 10:40:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:15 UTC