On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 03:05:06AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Hmm, I'm not sure this is the same bug I was seeing, because mine went > > away when I turned off malloc debugging. > > Without malloc debugging the chance that the allocated memory has > zeroes is large(r). Going past the terminating '\0' if it's followed > by another one then hides the bug. With J, malloc() makes sure the > allocated memory is not zero and thus exposes the bug. Sounds plausible. Good catch! Kris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:15 UTC