Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

From: Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des_at_des.no>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 01:45:48 +0200
Peter Wemm <peter_at_wemm.org> writes:
> Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, and
> is rather consistent.

"told you so"

> So, who has been messing with make(1) lately?

I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just
happens to be triggered by make(1) because it is a big (if not the
biggest) vfork(2) consumer.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des_at_des.no
Received on Mon Jul 21 2003 - 14:45:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:16 UTC