>> >> atapci1: <Intel ICH5 SATA150 controller> port >> 0xd000-0xd00f,0xcc00-0xcc03,0xc800-0xc807,0xc400-0xc403,0xc000-0xc007 >> irq 9 at device 31.2 on pci0 >> ... >> ata2: at 0xc000 on atapci1 >> ad4: success setting UDMA133 on Intel ICH5 chip >> ad4: <ST3120023AS/3.01> ATA-6 disk at ata2-master >> ad4: 114473MB (234441648 sectors), 232581 C, 16 H, 63 S, 512 B >> ad4: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA133 >> ad4: piomode=12 dmamode=34 udmamode=70 cblid=1 >> >> Shouldn't this drive be found as a SATA150 device? > > Well, technically yes, but in practice the modes the drives reports > back as supported are the old UDMA ones, however the interface will > run at SATA150 speed no matter what. I've not found a surefire way > to tell this apart yet that also gives resonable results if you > use a SATA->PATA dongle and other wierd comboes now possible... > Yeah. My drive shows up as UDMA133 also. What I did notice is that my WD Raptor was slightly outperformed a few times on UFS2 by my actual ATA-100 Western Digital drive. This seems somewhat bad as the Raptor costs a hell of a lot more and one would hope that it would pound the ATA-100 drive pretty thoroughly. Even the CPU overheads on both drives were about the same. Maybe its that 8MB caching :). I haven't found a good reason yet. Soeren, do you actually have SATA drives to test with or do you just have SATA adapters with SATA->PATA dongles? Do you need more hardware to run some benchmarks yourself? [I don't know that I can afford to buy you a SATA disk but I wonder anyway :)] Dave > -Søren > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Thu Jul 24 2003 - 03:02:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:16 UTC