In message: <20030725050226.GF41445_at_skywalker.creative.net.au> Adrian Chadd <adrian_at_freebsd.org> writes: : On Thu, Jul 24, 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <20030724231947.I30706_at_topperwein.pennasoft.com> : > Chris BeHanna <behanna_at_behanna.org> writes: : > : Can't they just redact that information from the spec.? : > : > Typically no. Even in a redacted spec it would be painfully obvious : > what to do. Also, different regulatory domains have different : > frequencies that are real no-nos in other regulatory domains and : > they'd need to document how to properly generate the RF in both : > cases. : : So, assuming that there's at least one person smart enough to reverse : engineer the binary driver but stupid enough to release it publicly, : what happens to the manufacturer there? : : Can they now take "they took relevant steps" as a defence in a law court? That's a very interesting question. WarnerReceived on Fri Jul 25 2003 - 03:38:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:16 UTC