On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 01:42, Terry Lambert wrote: > I do know that even if they remove the bridge, they are unlikely > to provide enough documentation to boot and run natively on the > hardware without having IBM code setting up the bus arbitration > and other bits that are currently undocumented. Why would IBM try to hide this? Wouldn't they *want* people to take full advantage of the processor for the best performance to help give their product a good image? -- Shawn <drevil_at_warpcore.org> http://drevil.warpcore.org/Received on Fri Jul 25 2003 - 04:22:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:16 UTC