On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 19:47:50 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20030727010938.GF45069_at_wantadilla.lemis.com> > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog_at_freebsd.org> writes: >> On Saturday, 26 July 2003 at 18:44:43 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: >>> In message: <20030727002138.GD45069_at_wantadilla.lemis.com> >>> "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: >>>> I had also expected that you could shed some light on the BIOS mapping >>>> issue. Since my last message I've become pretty sure that it must be >>>> something to do with the chip set setup. Is it possible that we're >>>> not mapping the entire area 0xc0000 to 0xfffff? >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean by this question. Since OLDCARD works, and >>> requires read/write access to that physical memory range, I doubt that >>> it is unmapped. >> >> I'm not sure at what level. I suspect that something in the chipset >> is turning off that area of memory, or mapping something else to it. >> The dump from Microsoft shows that there's another BIOS at 0xcf000, >> but what I have mapped in memory shows only 0xff up to address >> 0xd0000, where I find another BIOS signature: >> >> 0x28377fe0: 0xffffffff 0xffffffff 0xffffffff 0xffffffff >> 0x28377ff0: 0xffffffff 0xffffffff 0xffffffff 0xffffffff >> 0x28378000: 0xe80caa55 0x4ecb14c8 0x0000033b 0x00000000 >> 0x28378010: 0x00000000 0x00200000 0x00600040 0x90c08b2e >> 0x28378020: 0x49444e55 0x0000ea16 0x0c9d0201 0xad100800 > > Typically, there are a number of different ROM sections. The orm > driver searches for these things out. Does it report anything Presuming that it's the ROM driver, I get this in the dmesg I posted: pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum That's pretty much the same problem reported by the X server. Where would I go from there? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:16 UTC