On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 07:08:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > On 29.07.2003 18:47, Robert Watson wrote: > > > >Someone, and unfortunately I appear to have lost track of who, had some > >tweaks to the rcNG scripts to set up some reasonable devfs rules for a > >jail, and apply them to the devfs mounted in a jail. Otherwise, you risk > >exposing "undesired" device nodes to the virtual environment. I suspect a > >search of the -current archives will turn up who, but I think a necessary > >part of a solution here will be to make sure jails are set up with the > >right devfs contents. > > Sorry, overseen. Sct W. Hetzel was the submitter, but it never becomes > committed. If could be be so kind, please :-) (of course, not without > prove it first) Yeah, I'll take care of this. I had asked scott to mail me his final patch so I could commit it, but I never heard back from him. I'll dig out the revisions from my mail archives and combine the two. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm_at_identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 mtm_at_FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon!Received on Tue Jul 29 2003 - 08:22:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:16 UTC