Is this normal that multiple installations of 5.1-RELEASE complain when running bsdlabel: # /dev/ad0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 524288 63 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32776 b: 4194304 524351 swap c: 39102273 63 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 1048576 4718655 4.2BSD 2048 16384 8 e: 33335105 5767231 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 partition c: partition extends past end of unit bsdlabel: partition c doesn't start at 0! bsdlabel: An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities partition e: partition extends past end of unit This does not seem to happen if the disk has been labeled by previous versions and upgraded from source. PeteReceived on Wed Jul 30 2003 - 01:19:13 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC