Re: make -U

From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy_at_mips.inka.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 13:39:58 +0000 (UTC)

Juli Mallett <jmallett_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Why go thru those contortions?  I sometimes use "make FOO=" to define
> things.  -U obviously has a place, if it not existing means I have to
> have all these contortions to do a fairly obvious thing, yeah?

What are the exact semantics of -U supposed to be?

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy_at_mips.inka.de

Received on Thu Jul 31 2003 - 05:31:38 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Michael McGoldrick: "Re: mbuf double-free panic"
Previous message: Wilko Bulte: "Re: Alpha/EISA broken?"
Maybe in reply to: Ruslan Ermilov: "make -U"
Next in thread: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: make -U"
Reply: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: make -U"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:17 UTC