Re: raidframe

From: Petri Helenius <pete_at_he.iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 22:46:11 +0300

> RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be
> unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it
> will be fixed before 5.2.
> 
Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place...

Pete

Received on Sun Jun 01 2003 - 10:46:24 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tinderbox: "[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64"
Previous message: Magnus J: "Re: Fatal trap on RELENG_5_1 SMP"
Maybe in reply to: Petri Helenius: "raidframe"
Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: raidframe"
Reply: Scott Long: "Re: raidframe"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:10 UTC