On 02 Jun 2003 17:38:28 +1000 Mark Sergeant <msergeant_at_snsonline.net> wrote: > Umm shouldn't you be trying to umount /mnt ? I retested this and now used /mnt in the umount invocation... (<blush>I hope I'm awake now.</blush>). It umounts now successfully. I noticed some commits to the vfs layer between my last kernel and the actual one, either the bug is fixed now (I'm sure last time I had the problems I used /mnt in the umount invocation, not any other mounted FS), or the bug only get's triggered only in a specific situation I wasn't able to reproduce now. Bye, Alexander. -- The best things in life are free, but the expensive ones are still worth a look. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7Received on Sun Jun 01 2003 - 23:09:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:10 UTC