Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Scott Long wrote: > > > Bryan Liesner wrote: > > > It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point > > > that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that > > > was build in a totally clean environment? > > > > The changed code is not protecting a traversal of a proc > > struct member with a proc lock in two places. What's hard > > to imagine? > > This is no longer the case with the latest revision. Apparently the > panics in cam continue even after the proc lock issues were fixed. As I said: I still think there is a lost serialization here that's at the root of the problem. I can't really dedicate the equipment I have here to reproducing the issue at this time, or I'd track down the race I think may be happening. -- TerryReceived on Thu Jun 05 2003 - 02:11:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:10 UTC