On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:10:35 -0500, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7_at_cox.net> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:14:25 +0200, Alexander Leidinger > <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> is there a way to teach our ACPI implementation about >> >> none0_at_pci0:7:4: class=0x068000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 >> hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' >> device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller' >> class = bridge >> subclass = PCI-unknown Oh, it seems to be little different but I have the same 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller'.. =============================== none0_at_pci0:7:4: class=0x0c0500 card=0x30571106 chip=0x30571106 rev=0x40 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'VIA Technologies Inc' device = 'VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller' class = serial bus <-- diff here.. subclass = SMBus <-- diff here.. =============================== Cheers, Mezz > I own the same chipest here, which it is support in 4.x and no longer in > 5.x.. :-( Note that, I only check in the 5.x's NOTES and haven't tried to > put some opinion from 4.x to 5.x yet. I don't know if it will work. > > In 4.x, you just add in the kernel config following: > > =============================== > # VT82C686A/B ACPI Power Management Controller > device smbus > device viapm > > device iicbus > device iicbb > > device ic > device iic > device iicsmb > =============================== > > I would like to see someone to bring 4.x drivers to 5.x as well. Too bad, > I know nothing with C, but just a hello world. > > Cheers, > Mezz > >> Bye, >> Alexander. -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.Received on Thu Jun 05 2003 - 09:33:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:10 UTC