Re: Bulding libc.so with gnu99 is dangerous!

From: Andrey Chernov <ache_at_nagual.pp.ru>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 23:51:28 +0400
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:44:27 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 07:40:53PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> > After installing libc.so builded with standard bsd.sys.mk (i.e. with 
> > gnu99) all shared programs reports missing 'SYS_sigreturn' name and fails 
> > to start.
> > 
> > When I restore old libc and rebuild libc without gnu99, all works fine
> > again.
> 
> Please provide sufficent detail that I can track down your problem.

The problem itself is gone with updating to new bsd.sys.mk where now
CSTD            ?=      c99
for i386, but some time ago there was
CSTD            ?=      gnu99
for i386 and I just build/install libc to trigger the bug.
Received on Fri Jun 13 2003 - 10:51:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:11 UTC