In message <3EF2B034.8050002_at_earthmagic.org>, Johny Mattsson writes: >> I think we need somebody to reconsider how we configure our filesystems >> in the future, in order to avoid a confusion of config files whose >> interrelationship users will have no chance of figuring out. > >Are you referring just to the (currently messy) disk >config/attach/whatever order, or a more drastic overhaul of how we >configure disk settings? >I haven't worked with CCD, Vinum, or GBDE (yet), so I'm not sure if I'll >be a good person to tackle it, but I'll certainly give it some thought >though. Sounds like an interesting little challenge that I may just be >able to find time for :) I don't know exactly what I am looking for, if I did, I'd just implement it, but I think that we should be able describe our disk configuration with just one single file in a human+program parseable format, rather than having to have one file per "gadget". -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Thu Jun 19 2003 - 22:01:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:12 UTC