Re: Why doesn't background fsck work ?

From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 21:00:06 +0200
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 00:25:22 -0700
Terry Lambert <tlambert2_at_mindspring.com> wrote:

> Then you reboot.
> 
> Then you start BG fsck again.
> 
> Then you panic again.
> 
> Repeat this until a human intervenes and manually runs a full FG
> fsck on the disk before letting it be used, and/or someone adds
> a count-down counter to the superblock,

I have a dejá vue... I think there was already a discussion on this
topic (and you participated in it)... and I think someone pointed out,
that we already have a mechanism which does a fg-fsck instead of a
bg-fsck in such a situation... but maybe someone just changed the Matrix
around me...

Bye,
Alexander.

-- 
                           Reboot America.

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Received on Sun Jun 22 2003 - 10:00:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:12 UTC