Artem 'Zazoobr' Ignatjev wrote: > Juli Mallett wrote: > >>Anyone with insight into this? >> >>(jmallett_at_big-lizard:~)39% ( echo 1 ; ( ( echo 2 ; echo 3 ) | xargs -I% echo + % ) ) >>1 >>+ 2 >>+ 3 >>(jmallett_at_big-lizard:~)40% ( echo 1 ; ( ( echo 2 ; echo 3 ) | xargs -I% echo + % ) ) | cat >>1 >>+ +2 >>3 > > last cat is not necessary... > And it's more weird than that: > >>( echo 1 ; ( ( echo 2 ; echo 3 ) | xargs -I% echo -- + % ) ) > > 1 > -- --+ +2 > 3 > Hmmm... This looks like xargs isn't waiting for the subcommand to exit. This looks like 'echo -- + 2' and 'echo -- + 3' are running concurrently. TimReceived on Tue Jun 24 2003 - 19:16:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:13 UTC