>Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 08:46:39 -0800 (PST) >From: David Wolfskill <david_at_catwhisker.org> [Yes, I'm responding to my own post....] >Got -CURRENT (re-)built; booted, logged in, poked around, seemed OK; >issued: > sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p >(to switch to default to booting from -STABLE next time I bring the >machine up, then power the machine off). >Was greeted on the xterm that has the serial console by: >... >r system process `bufdaemon' to stop... >Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode >cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 01000000 >instruction pointer = 0x8:0xd68e2d0a >stack pointer = 0x10:0xd68e2ce4 >frame pointer = 0x10:0x8 >code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >current process = 11 (idle: cpu1)stopped >r' to stop...60 seconds) for system process `synce >kernel: type 9 trap, code=0 >Stopped at 0xd68e2d0a: mov %si,%ss >db> tr >.... >As you can see, the box is SMP (2x886 MHz PIIIs); 512 MB RAM iirc. Very >little customization for the kernel beyond tweaking GENERIC for SMP. >I'm presently building -CURRENT from equivalent sources on my (UP) >laptop. Interestingly enough, I had no problems at all on my laptop. Each machine has a single ATA disk drive; other than /tmp (which is a swap-backed md memory disk), all mounted file systems are UFS (not UFS2); each UFS file system [that sounds redundant...] has soft updates enabled. I just tried telling kdb to panic, and got: db> panic panic: from debugger cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 01000000 Debugger("panic") Fatal trap 3: breakpoint instruction fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 01000000 instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0341ba5 stack pointer = 0x10:0xd68e2a8c frame pointer = 0x10:0xd68e2a98 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = IOPL = 0 current process = 11 (idle: cpu1) Stopped at 0xd68e2d0a: mov %si,%ss db> Peace, david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) -- David H. Wolfskill david_at_catwhisker.org Based on what I have seen to date, the use of Microsoft products is not consistent with reliability. I recommend FreeBSD for reliable systems.Received on Fri Mar 28 2003 - 17:34:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC