Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y)

From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:27 -0800
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> And trust me, as long as gcc ships with a description of other
> optimizations beneath "-O" there will be (clueless or smart... does it
> really matter here?) people which will try those optimizations on
> everything

Not to mention bullshit ones like "-O9".  I see that all the time.  What
do these poeple think they are buying with that?????

GCC should stop accepting -O values higher than what does anything.
Received on Fri Mar 28 2003 - 18:46:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:02 UTC