Correct me if I am wrong, but zlib isn't released under the GPL, so you could switch to using /usr/bin/minigzip instead and it becomes a moot point. Seeya...Q On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 03:33, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > Thomas Seck wrote: > > * Garrett Wollman (wollman_at_lcs.mit.edu): > > > > > >>The correct answer for one of these has no implications on any of > >>the others. > > > > > > I am just a user but I'll second that. > > > > Am I the only one who thinks that some people are on a "kill the GNU, > > kill it now, no matter the cost" trip again? > > > > I can see no benefit in switching to bzip2 other than eliminating GPL'ed > > software. No, I do not think disk space is an issue nowadays. > > If two programs do the same thing, but one is GPL and the other is not, > the other one is clearly preferable for FreeBSD. > > As far as _ports_ are concerned, it is irrelevant. As far as the _base_ > system is concerned, the less we depend on GPL, the better. > > The "sole benefit" you see is clearly enough of a benefit. There _are_ > good reasons to reduce dependency on GPL, y'know.Received on Fri May 02 2003 - 08:53:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:05 UTC