Robert Watson wrote: > Try moving the PROC_UNLOCK() call from line 79 to just after line 84 > (i.e., before the error check and possible uiomove()). It looks like some > similar bugs might exist in other bits of procfs. I've attached a patch > that tries to more generally handle use of the proc lock more properly > with uiomove(), but might also not be perfect. You last patch there is exactly the patch I suggested for a similar problem, last week. -- TerryReceived on Sun May 04 2003 - 11:05:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC