Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>2) Does the "WARNING: Expected rawoffset 37752750, found 0" spell >> trouble ahead, and if so, what should I do to fix it? > > It should be harmless. > > I would be very interested if you could try to compile the "bsdlabel" > program in src/sbin/bsdlabel and tell me what that says about your > disk. I'm seeing this, too: [root_at_nik: /etc] dmesg | grep raw WARNING: Expected rawoffset 63, found 0 WARNING: Expected rawoffset 63, found 0 WARNING: Expected rawoffset 63, found 0 WARNING: Expected rawoffset 50331645, found 0 bsdlabel and disklabel show the exact same output for all disks, e.g. [root_at_nik: ~] disklabel /dev/da0s1 # /dev/da0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 8388608 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28512 c: 50331582 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 8388608 8388608 unused 0 0 e: 4194304 16777216 unused 0 0 f: 29360062 20971520 unused 0 0 [root_at_nik: ~] bsdlabel /dev/da0s1 # /dev/da0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 8388608 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28512 c: 50331582 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 8388608 8388608 unused 0 0 e: 4194304 16777216 unused 0 0 f: 29360062 20971520 unused 0 0 Could it have something to do with ccd? I stripe the d, e and f partitions together with their counterparts on da1 for /var, /tmp and /usr. Lars -- Lars Eggert <larse_at_isi.edu> USC Information Sciences Institute
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC