> So, the question is, if RELENG_4 fsck doesn't grok UFS2 file systems, > why did it try to fsck it? Shouldn't it just give up when it realizes > that it's not a UFS1 fs? Probably because there once was a UFS1 fs on that partition. The UFS2 superblock is located further back, and when you newfs a UFS2 fs, the old superblock doesn't get overwritten. See also bin/51619. best regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: l.ertl_at_univie.ac.at UNIX-Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID) Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 der Universität Wien http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/Received on Tue May 06 2003 - 23:15:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC