Ian Dowse wrote: > > In message <3EB2FB35.8060104_at_btc.adaptec.com>, Scott Long writes: > >Kirk and all, > > > >Recently a panic started appearing on mine and other's systems while > >under load. I have an SMP system with all UFS1+softupdates > > Try reverting revisions sys/vm/vm_object.c 1.274 and kern/vfs_subr.c > revision 1.444, i.e. apply the patch below. I think there may be > cases where the `all' flag was necessary; instrumentation of > vm_object_page_remove() in a kernel from Apr 5th shows cases where > pages with both wrapped negative (indirection blocks I presume) and > larger than object->size page indices get selected, so this would > have been broken by limiting the range to < object->size. > Please take a look at vm_object_page_clean(). If end == 0, it relies on object->size to determine the extent of the pages for cleaning. In light of the above, particularly, the positive indices, we should be worried that msync is skipping pages. AlanReceived on Wed May 07 2003 - 10:45:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:06 UTC