Re: LOR with -current

In message: <16058.36990.299231.566625_at_grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
            Andrew Gallatin <gallatin_at_cs.duke.edu> writes:
: 
: M. Warner Losh writes:
:  > In message: <20030508.124929.74756191.haro_at_kgt.co.jp>
:  >             Munehiro Matsuda <haro_at_kgt.co.jp> writes:
:  > : Hi all,
:  > : 
:  > : I got this LOR with today's -current, when I tried to start X Window up.
:  > : 
:  > : lock order reversal
:  > :  1st 0xc30b94c0 vm object (vm object) _at_ vm/vm_object.c:507
:  > :  2nd 0xc082f110 system map (system map) _at_ vm/vm_kern.c:325
:  > 
:  > That reminds me, would anybody object if I were to hack traceback so
:  > that it would actually put the traceback in the dmesg buffer when not
:  > called from ddb?
: 
: FWIW, I think that tracebacks generated from DDB_TRACE should also
: go into the dmesg buffer.  It would save quite a few initial exchanges
: with users..

Does anybdoy know why the ddb output doesn't go into the dmesg buffer
in general?  It sure would save me a lot of grief as well if it did.

Warner