Heiko Schaefer wrote: > > Terry mentioned that he explained it to Bosco, and that he had a patch to > > work around it in a different way. But that was from November, time has > > passed since then. > > a nice workaround would be great, of course. assuming terry knows what > he's doing, i'm sure such code would be preferrable to turning on these > options by default. but until then, turning them on sounds like the safest > bet to me. i'd sacrifice some speed for reliability anyday. and so far i > felt that freebsd always had that philosophy. It's Bosko's workaround. I have a binary patch with two .o's (machdep.o and locore.o) that I've given a couple of people who agreed not to disassemble it which contains a fix based on my understanding of the problem; it worked for them. Being binary, it's not really appropriate to -current any more. Bosko's is preferred, because it doesn't disclose the nature of the bug, so it's OK to pass around as source code. -- TerryReceived on Thu May 08 2003 - 19:56:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:07 UTC