Re: Dump(8) hosed on CURRENT

From: Lukas Ertl <l.ertl_at_univie.ac.at>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:

> Martin Blapp wrote:
> >
> >>I now did a test with dump -L on a live filesystem, and I've seen the
> >>"file expected but not found" error, too. There's obviously something
> >>broken, we should check if it's related to -L or if it happens always.
> >
> > I just tested it without "-L" on a live, but not active filesystem.
> > The restore finishes fine and everything seems to be there.
> >
> > So dump -L is broken :-(
>
> Now, how about making a snapshot and backing that up instead of using -L?

The -L flag to dump takes a snapshot. And if you create it by hand with
mksnap_ffs(8) you probably back it up with dump (the trick in the dump
source is to create the snapshot, open it and then unlink it).

regards,
le

-- 
Lukas Ertl                             eMail: l.ertl_at_univie.ac.at
UNIX-Systemadministrator               Tel.:  (+43 1) 4277-14073
Zentraler Informatikdienst (ZID)       Fax.:  (+43 1) 4277-9140
der Universität Wien                   http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/
Received on Mon May 12 2003 - 11:26:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:07 UTC