On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 10:15:31PM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote: > > May 9 16:03:16 brian kernel: acpi_cmbat0: battery initialization failed, giving up > > May 9 16:03:16 brian kernel: acpi_cmbat1: battery initialization failed, giving up > > > > where before the last import, I only got the message about acpi_cmbat1 (which albeit > > not correct is ok, since the battery is not there). > > I've traced this to the BIF_ object. I'm trying to trace down where the > length of 0 is introduced. I'm not sure what you're referring to; I've read your other messages and it seems to me that the issue I'm seeing is completely unrelated to the one you're seeing. I've never had a message about 0 length buffers; in fact, the only similarity I can see is that both appeared after the latest import, and that's all. Regardless, this bug is not very interesting; the other one I mentioned (temperature evalutating to 65535 (= (short)-1) is worse. Bye, Andrea -- Intel: where Quality is job number 0.9998782345!Received on Wed May 14 2003 - 22:42:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC