Re: 5.1-BETA umount problems

From: Makoto Matsushita <matusita_at_jp.FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 13:16:46 +0900
truckman> IMHO, "umount -f /lib" should have failed in this case.

I don't think so.  -f means 'force', so it should be successed even if
this cause something trouble to running system.  If it would be
unacceptable, there's easy way to solve it: don't use -f anymore, or
add a new umount(8) option to do that.

-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
Received on Sun May 18 2003 - 19:16:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC