On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:21:19PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:14:01AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > I can see the point in having only a module, but then > > I could say I was confused by sparc64/GENERIC which > > has both. > > sparc64/GENERIC was the old-man out. I feel we should return > {i386,alpha,ia64}/GENERIC back to their previous way of no ispfw since > this is quite late in the 5.1 game to be changing this. I then think we > should ponder making sparc64 consistent with {i386,alpha,ia64}/GENERIC. > I do not object. Removing it now from sparc64/GENERIC would be premature since sparc64 does not have drivers.conf, and this would give us the BOOTMFS without it, and without being able to load it as a module. It may be even worth leaving the ispfw commented out in the GENERIC configs, and explain why it is commented out here. (ia64/GENERIC I didn't even touch.) Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru_at_sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru_at_FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:08 UTC