Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_FreeBSD.org> writes: > Works for the generic case, but not for this particular example. > Just run "shutdown -k now" locally, and watch how funny the login > session looks. I don't think we're leaking something here. ;) > Hm, or maybe this is just the problem with pam_nologin(8) not > respecting the "no_warn" option? hmm I think you're right - in the nologin case, information leak isn't an issue. We should change it to requisite. I need to go through the policies and change "sufficient" to "binding" anyway, so I'll take care of it once the freeze lifts. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des_at_ofug.orgReceived on Fri May 23 2003 - 10:54:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC