In message <200305241322.37065.chris_at_pennasoft.com>, Chris BeHanna writes: >On Tuesday 20 May 2003 08:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <20030520120114.U60060_at_daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer >writes: >> >but i still don't see why the processes that are named gbde-something >> >would take up _that_ much cpu time ... does that look reasonable and >> >explicable to you? >> >> The crypto work _does_ take time. I am only just starting to measure >> how much for my GBDE paper now, so I don't really have anything >> to compare your numbers with. > > Would hardware crypto or hardware RNG help? Eventually it will, but right now I have no access to any AES hw, so I have put off integrating support for hw-assisted crypto until at point in time where I can actually test it. Sam says he may know of some AES able hardware in the pipeline, I'm keeping my hopes pinned on that. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Sat May 24 2003 - 12:37:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC