>Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:18 -0400 >From: "Will Saxon" <WillS_at_housing.ufl.edu> >> I cvsupped the source this morning and I get: >> [...] >> ===> firewire/firewire >> ... >> In file included from /usr/src/sys/dev/firewire/fwohci.c:72: >> _at_/dev/firewire/fwdma.h:38: redefinition of `bus_dmasync_op_t' >> machine/bus_dma.h:94: `bus_dmasync_op_t' previously declared here >> *** Error code 1 >> [...] >I have the exact same problem. I think it has something to do with a commit from this morning. >I commented out the offending #define in fwdma.h and the module compiles fine now. I decided to go ahead and hack the code a bit (on my tree); the following patch (relaative to /usr/src) seems to work for me: Index: sys/dev/firewire/fwdma.h =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/freebsd/src/sys/dev/firewire/fwdma.h,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 fwdma.h --- sys/dev/firewire/fwdma.h 17 Apr 2003 03:38:02 -0000 1.1 +++ sys/dev/firewire/fwdma.h 27 May 2003 16:14:57 -0000 _at__at_ -34,7 +34,7 _at__at_ * $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/firewire/fwdma.h,v 1.1 2003/04/17 03:38:02 simokawa Exp $ */ -#if __FreeBSD_version >= 500111 +#if (__FreeBSD_version >= 500111) && (__FreeBSD_version < 500113) typedef int bus_dmasync_op_t; #endif Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david_at_catwhisker.org Based on what I have seen to date, the use of Microsoft products is not consistent with reliability. I recommend FreeBSD for reliable systems.Received on Tue May 27 2003 - 07:39:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC