> > This may be my fault, as I made some changes recently that assumed that > > the mbuf allocator grabbed giant when needed. I'll check the code path > > you've mentioned to see if it grabs giant now, but I suspect that I just > > need to move the giant grabbing back where it was before. > This doesn't seem to be a reproduceable problem for me, FWIW, (presumably > a property of bucket sizes, etc) so you have all the information I have > :-). You'd have to be quite unlucky to trigger it (calling sendit at a time when a per-cpu mbuf pool was empty). I have a vague feeling that my sendit change isn't the only place that does this. > If possible, we should get this fix in for 5.1? Yep - from what Bosko says, my change shouldn't have been safe. I'll produce a patch and run it by him, and then talk to re_at_. David.Received on Wed May 28 2003 - 06:28:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:09 UTC