RE: [acpi-jp 2279] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree

Here's what we released:

#define ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID            0x0001
#define ACPI_FIRST_TABLE_ID             0xF000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate_at_root.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:00 AM
> To: Takayoshi Kochi
> Cc: acpi-jp_at_jp.FreeBSD.org; yosimoto_at_waishi.jp; current_at_freebsd.org
> Subject: [acpi-jp 2279] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
> 
> On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> > I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed
> > in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all
TABLE_ID_DSDT's,
> > I think.
> >
> > Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0,
> > otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict.
> >
> > I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel,
> > but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the
> > changes are intended).
> >
> > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> > some appropriate option.
> 
> Thank you for the patch.  Since we are only days away from a release,
I
> would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and
instead
> stick to hard-coding the defaults.  This is the safer way for 5.1R.
We
> will do a new import and more fixes after the release.
> 
> -Nate