On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 01:09:07PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > Barney Wolff wrote: > > > Implies the sending host is not honoring the MTU restriction when > > > deciding whether or not to frag packets. > > > > 67582 looks awfully bogus even as a pre-frag length. How could that come > > over the wire? > > The sending host is not honoring the MTU restriction? > > 8-) 8-). > > Most likely, a direct call to ether_output, or a code path that > results in fragmentation not being implemented; see my other post: > it could be that he's using NFS over UDP, and that's doing it. Er, how is it possible to send a UDP packet > 65535? Last time I looked it was a 16-bit field. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.Received on Sat Nov 01 2003 - 14:24:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC