For giggles I'm rolling back vfs_default.c back to 1.87 since its along the backtrace path. I suspect I'll need to back up the whole thing to before the commit for the struct mount locking until jeff & kan can straighten things out. On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 peter.edwards_at_openet-telecom.com wrote: > > > >I can confirm the lockmgr panic on shutdown reported by someone else > >earlier (whose message I mistakenly deleted). > > > >It looks like swapper is trying to undo a lock from pagedaemon and runs > >into trouble. This is probably related to the Giant pushdown of > >vm_pageout() that alc did last week. > > > >I'm building with INVARIANTS to see if that will catch more info. Will > >report back soon. > > Just happened me too. I think I see the problem: > > When boot() calls sync(), it passes &thread0 as the thread argument. > This gets propgated up to ffs_sync, which: > > calls vget(), which takes a thread argument. > does some stuff > calls vput(), which does _not_ take a thread argument > > The vget() is passed thread0, as passed from boot. > The vput() gets the current thread, which is the process calling boot. > > The unlocking in vput is asserting that the same thread that aquired > the lock is releasing it, which seems reasonable. > > The obvious solution might be to change line 1161 of ffs_vfsops to > pass vget() "curthread" rather than td. I assume there's a good > reason why "thread0" is passed from boot(), but I can't see why > that's of any use to the vnode locking. > > i.e.: > Index: ffs_vfsops.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /usr/cvs/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c,v > retrieving revision 1.221 > diff -u -r1.221 ffs_vfsops.c > --- ffs_vfsops.c 1 Nov 2003 05:51:54 -0000 1.221 > +++ ffs_vfsops.c 2 Nov 2003 03:06:42 -0000 > _at__at_ -1158,7 +1158,7 _at__at_ > continue; > } > mtx_unlock(&mntvnode_mtx); > - if ((error = vget(vp, lockreq, td)) != 0) { > + if ((error = vget(vp, lockreq, curthread)) != 0) { > mtx_lock(&mntvnode_mtx); > if (error == ENOENT) > goto loop; > > > How come tha parameters to vget and vput are lopsided like this? > > This might have something to do with the commit > of revision 1.218 of ffs_vfsops.c, but I'm not sure. > > -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite_at_gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Sat Nov 01 2003 - 17:13:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC