You might be aware that OpenBSD has introduced a 2-clause BSD-licensed high availability and load balancing protocol called CARP: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=106642790513590&w=2 http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20031018101733 I have a working patchset to bring CARP to FreeBSD-Current and would like to hear you opinon: http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/carp.html CARP shows itself as virtual interfaces carpX and works a bit like vlan interfaces. For comunication between the servers which share a common address it uses a multicast group. It supports both IPv4 and IPv6 common addresses and should work on ETHERNET, FDDI and TOKENRING nets - later two untested, though. Standing problems: - IPv4: * Server can't access the common address while MASTER for it. OpenBSD has a workaround for this, but we can't add host routes with virtual interfaces as gateway, so we need another fix. - IPv6: * Traffic to the common address on the server is always threated locally, even when in BACKUP state. * in6_ifattach() will error out - this seems to have no ill effects and can easily be fixed by selecting a special if_type for CARP interfaces. - Locking?!? - You tell me! Tests: Very basic tests for IPv4 and IPv6 performed with OpenBSD as a "known good" peer. I have very limited test environment at the moment. Code: http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/carp.diff Perforce: branch mlaier_carp -- Best regards, Max Laier mailto:max_at_love2party.netReceived on Wed Nov 05 2003 - 08:50:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC