Kris, it looks like Pacbell/Prodigy are rejecting mail sent to kris_at_obsecurity.org that is forwarded by your gandi.net forwarding... Adi On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:31:51AM +0100, Mail Delivery System wrote: Content-Description: Notification > This is the Postfix program at host glenlivet.gandi.net. > > I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned > below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. > > For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster> > > If you do so, please include this problem report. You can > delete your own text from the message returned below. > > The Postfix program > > <kennaway_at_pacbell.net>: host pbimail3.prodigy.net[207.115.63.108] said: 553 > 5.3.0 DNSBL:To request removal of,[62.80.122.197],send and E-mail to > abuse_at_prodigy.net (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Content-Description: Delivery error report > Reporting-MTA: dns; glenlivet.gandi.net > Arrival-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 00:31:50 +0100 (CET) > > Final-Recipient: rfc822; kennaway_at_pacbell.net > Action: failed > Status: 5.0.0 > Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host pbimail3.prodigy.net[207.115.63.108] said: 553 > 5.3.0 DNSBL:To request removal of,[62.80.122.197],send and E-mail to > abuse_at_prodigy.net (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Content-Description: Undelivered Message > Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 15:31:48 -0800 > From: Aditya <aditya_at_grot.org> > To: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org> > Cc: current_at_freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ssh port forwarding changed under 5-CURRENT vs. STABLE? > In-Reply-To: <20031106232921.GB9791_at_rot13.obsecurity.org> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:29:21PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 01:43:43PM -0800, Aditya wrote: > > > > > debug1: Connections to local port 8000 forwarded to remote address > > > www.freebsd.org:80 > > > debug1: Local forwarding listening on 127.0.0.1 port 8000. > > > bind: Can't assign requested address > > > channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 8000 > > > Could not request local forwarding. > > > > > > and I can't see any reason why the binding would fail: > > > > Is something else (e.g. another ssh session) already bound to that port? > > nope -- and I've tried all sorts of ports other than 8000 too: > > hilbert[ttyp1]:aditya~> netstat -an | grep -i LIST > hilbert[ttyp1]:aditya~> > hilbert[ttyp1]:aditya~> sockstat -4 > USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS > aditya ssh 1289 3 tcp4 66.117.144.206:54376 66.117.144.211:22 > root dhclient 1287 5 udp4 *:68 *:* > > AdiReceived on Thu Nov 06 2003 - 14:34:10 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC