On 11-Nov-2003 Jason wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > >>On 11-Nov-2003 Jason wrote: >> >> >>>I just wanted to let someone know that my buildworld fails at >>>/usr/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/boot2.c at line 362. I get an undefined >>>error for RB_BOOTINFO, by adding #define RB_BOOTINFO 0x1f it worked. >>>Also it failed at sendmail.fc or something, I don't use send mail so I >>>just did not build it. It looks like someone already reported the >>>device apic problem. I just tryed option smp and device apic on my >>>single proc athlon, panic on boot unless I chose no apic or is it no >>>acpi(?) at boot. >>> >>> >> >>No ACPI is what you can choose at boot. Can you post the panic message? >> >> >> >>>By the way, why adding the smp options do any good for my machine? I >>>mostly care about speed, but it seems it might just make the os unstable >>>for me. >>> >>> >> >>You can always compile a custom kernel without SMP if you wish. device >>apic can be helpful because PCI devices do not have to share interrupts. >>Enabling SMP in GENERIC means that SMP machines now work out of the box. >>It also means that a sysadmin can use one kernel across both UP and SMP >>machines in a hetergeneous environment which can ease system >>administration in some cases. >> >> >> > I like the idea of not sharing irqs. Can I have apic without smp on? Yes. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/Received on Tue Nov 11 2003 - 12:40:20 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:28 UTC