Re: ULE and very bad responsiveness

From: Harald Schmalzbauer <h_at_schmalzbauer.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:27:57 +0100
On Thursday 13 November 2003 07:17, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc:
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On 2003-11-13, Harald Schmalzbauer <news_at_schmalzbauer.de> wrote:
> >> Well, I don't have any measurements but in my case it's not neccessary
> >> at all. I built a UP kernel with ULE like Kris advised me.
> >
> > Are you running an up-to-date 5.1-CURRENT?  ULE was broken with these
> > characteristics until very recently.  If you're up-to-date and still
> > see these problems, you need to post to the current mailing list.
> >
> > Kris
>
> Yes, I am running current as of 13. Nov.
>
> Find attached my first problem description.

This time I also attached my dmesg and kernel conf

>
> Thanks,
>
> -Harry

Received on Wed Nov 12 2003 - 21:28:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:28 UTC