Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes...

Bruce Evans wrote:
> I just got around to testing the patch in that reply:
[ ... ]
> This seems to work.  On a 2TB-epsilon ffs1 file system (*) on an md malloc
> disk (**):

Try it again.  This time, take the remote FS below its free reserve
as the root user, and see what the client machine reports.  Compare
the results to an identical local FS.

-- Terry