On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 02:45:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > For 6.0, can we start off libc at libc.so.YYYYMMDD and move it > > back to libc.so.6 for the first release? That way we can bump > > it whenever we want to avoid the "bumpy" rides for -current > > folk. > > This is a great idea! Provided that we 1. keep the major number to allow concurrent development of different (major) library versions, and 2. replace the date with a convenient sequence number, which we can call the minor version number, and 3. Do not reset the version number when we release. E.g.: libc.so.6.0, libc.so.6.1, and (first release) libc.so.6.2... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel_at_xcllnt.netReceived on Sat Nov 15 2003 - 14:16:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:29 UTC